State v. Spikes, 967 A.2d 114 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Spikes, 967 A.2d 114 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Sherman (connappct, 2011-03-22) · Strongest negative: Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (conn, 2016-12-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Conn. · 2016 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Council 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. State Board of Labor Relations , 111 Conn.App. 666 , 676, 961 A.2d 451 (2008) (holding, with limited analysis and not considering American Rule, that "imposition of attorney's fees and costs is consistent with ... § 7-471 [5]" because board "made a specific finding that the award would be an effective and legitimate remedy for breach by the [plaintiff] union of the duty of fair representation"), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 901 , 967 A.2d 112 (2009).
cited Cited "see" State v. Sherman
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Spikes, 111 Conn. App. 543, 554 , 961 A.2d 426 (2008) , cert, denied, 291 Conn. 901 , 967 A.2d 114 , cert, denied, 558 U.S. 898 , 130 S. Ct. 249 , 175 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Cote
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id., 110; see also State v. Spikes, 111 Conn. App. 543, 555-56 , 961 A.2d 426 (2008) (“[i]n the present case, on the basis of evidence that the defendant was seen at or near 291 Church Street at about the time of the burglary and that he had on his person at the time he was arrested some of the jewelry stolen from the premises, we conclude that the jury reasonably could have found that he illegally entered 291 Church Street on February 19, 2005, and stole that jewelry”), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 901 , 967 A.2d 114 , cert. denied, 558 U.S. 898 , 130 S. Ct. 249 , 175 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kalil
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id., 110; see also State v. Spikes, 111 Conn. App. 543, 555-56 , 961 A.2d 426 (2008) (“[i]n the present case, on the basis of evidence that the defendant was seen at or near 291 Church Street at about the time of the burglary and that he had on his person at the time he was arrested some of the jewelry stolen from the premises, we conclude that the jury reasonably could have found that he illegally entered 291 Church Street on February 19, 2005, and stole that jewelry”), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 901 , 967 A.2d 114 , cert. denied, 558 U.S. 898 , 130 S. Ct. 249 , 175 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Milton Spikes
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 11, 2009.
967 A.2d 114
RuthDaniella Weissman, special public defender, in support of the petition., LeonF. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
McLachlan.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 543 (AC 27547), is denied.

MCLACHLAN, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.