Bd. of Educ. v. Bloomfield Educ. Ass'n, 598 A.2d 517 (N.J. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Bd. of Educ. v. Bloomfield Educ. Ass'n, 598 A.2d 517 (N.J. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Board of Education of the Township of Bloomfield, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bloomfield Education Association, Defendant-Respondent
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 8, 1991.
598 A.2d 517
1991 N.J. LEXIS 116
Nathanya G. Simon argued the cause for appellant (Schwartz, Pisano, Simon & Edelstein, attorneys)., Kenneth I. Nowak argued the cause for respondent (Zazzali, Zazzali, Fagella & Nowak, attorneys)., Donna M. Kaye argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey School Boards Association (Michael F. Kaelber, attorney).
Per Curiam.
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 251 N.J.Super. 379, 598 A.2d 518 (1990).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Wilentz and Justices Clifford, Handler, Pollock, O’Hern, Garibaldi, and Stein. — 7

For reversal — None.