Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston
green
2 sentences1997Const. Co. v. Teamsters Local 469, 131 N.J.Super. 104, 114 , 328 A.2d 642 (Law Div.) (citing John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, 376 U.S. 543 , 84 S.Ct. 909 , 11 L.Ed.2d 898 (1964); International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Westinghouse Elec. 1997Const. Co. v. Teamsters Local 469, 131 N.J.Super. 104, 114 , 328 A.2d 642 (Law Div.) (citing John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, 376 U.S. 543 , 84 S.Ct. 909 , 11 L.Ed.2d 898 (1964); International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Westinghouse Elec. | 3 | 1973–1997 |
Board of Education v. Bloomfield Education Ass'n
neutral
2 sentences2006Ass'n, 251 N.J.Super. 379 , 598 A. 2d 518 (App.Div.1990), aff'd o.b., 126 N.J. 300 , 598 A. 2d 517 (1991), and explained that, in a public-sector setting, the following four-step analysis obtains: The duty to arbitrate springs from contract, and the parties can only be compelled to arbitrate those matters which are within the scope of the arbitration clause of their contract. [2] When there is a dispute as to whether a grievance falls within the terms of the arbitration clause of the contract, it is the duty of the courts to determine whether the matter is arbitrable. [3] However, in determini 2006Ass'n, 251 N.J.Super. 379 , 598 A. 2d 518 (App.Div.1990), aff'd o.b., 126 N.J. 300 , 598 A. 2d 517 (1991), and explained that, in a public-sector setting, the following four-step analysis obtains: The duty to arbitrate springs from contract, and the parties can only be compelled to arbitrate those matters which are within the scope of the arbitration clause of their contract. [2] When there is a dispute as to whether a grievance falls within the terms of the arbitration clause of the contract, it is the duty of the courts to determine whether the matter is arbitrable. [3] However, in determini | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Board of Educ. v. EDUC. ASS'N
green
2 sentences2006Ass'n, 251 N.J.Super. 379 , 598 A. 2d 518 (App.Div.1990), aff'd o.b., 126 N.J. 300 , 598 A. 2d 517 (1991), and explained that, in a public-sector setting, the following four-step analysis obtains: The duty to arbitrate springs from contract, and the parties can only be compelled to arbitrate those matters which are within the scope of the arbitration clause of their contract. [2] When there is a dispute as to whether a grievance falls within the terms of the arbitration clause of the contract, it is the duty of the courts to determine whether the matter is arbitrable. [3] However, in determini 2006Ass'n, 251 N.J.Super. 379 , 598 A. 2d 518 (App.Div.1990), aff'd o.b., 126 N.J. 300 , 598 A. 2d 517 (1991), and explained that, in a public-sector setting, the following four-step analysis obtains: The duty to arbitrate springs from contract, and the parties can only be compelled to arbitrate those matters which are within the scope of the arbitration clause of their contract. [2] When there is a dispute as to whether a grievance falls within the terms of the arbitration clause of the contract, it is the duty of the courts to determine whether the matter is arbitrable. [3] However, in determini | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Camden Board of Education v. Alexander
green
2 sentences2006The court may not, in any way, pass upon the merits of the actual dispute. [4] If the arbitrator is found to have jurisdiction over a matter, the court must send it to *916 arbitration, even though the court may think the dispute is patently frivolous. [ Camden Bd. of Educ. v. Alexander, supra, 181 N.J. at 204-05 , 854 A. 2d 342 (quoting Bd. of Educ. of the Twp. of Bloomfield v. Bloomfield Educ. 2006The court may not, in any way, pass upon the merits of the actual dispute. [4] If the arbitrator is found to have jurisdiction over a matter, the court must send it to *916 arbitration, even though the court may think the dispute is patently frivolous. [ Camden Bd. of Educ. v. Alexander, supra, 181 N.J. at 204-05 , 854 A. 2d 342 (quoting Bd. of Educ. of the Twp. of Bloomfield v. Bloomfield Educ. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
PT & L. CONST. CO. v. Teamsters Local 469
green
2 sentences1997Const. Co. v. Teamsters Local 469, 131 N.J.Super. 104, 114 , 328 A.2d 642 (Law Div.) (citing John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, 376 U.S. 543 , 84 S.Ct. 909 , 11 L.Ed.2d 898 (1964); International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Westinghouse Elec. 1997Const. Co. v. Teamsters Local 469, 131 N.J.Super. 104, 114 , 328 A.2d 642 (Law Div.) (citing John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, 376 U.S. 543 , 84 S.Ct. 909 , 11 L.Ed.2d 898 (1964); International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Westinghouse Elec. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
MEDFORD TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT VS. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC BUILDINGS AMERICAS, INC. (L-0787-18, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
green
1 sentence2024Id. at 4 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Raheel Khan v. Dell Inc
green
1 sentence2020In doing so, the judge specifically addressed defendant's reliance on our opinion in Flanzman, the FAA, the NJAA, and the Third Circuit's opinion in Khan v. Dell Inc., 669 F. 3d 350 (3rd Cir. 2012). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Harsen v. Bd. of Ed. of West Milford Tp.
green
2 sentences2004Bd. of Ed., 132 N.J.Super. 365 [ 333 A. 2d 580 ] (Law Div.1975).[2] When there is a dispute as to whether a grievance *354 falls within the terms of the arbitration clause of the contract, it is the duty of the courts to determine whether the matter is arbitrable. 2004Bd. of Ed., 132 N.J.Super. 365 [ 333 A. 2d 580 ] (Law Div.1975).[2] When there is a dispute as to whether a grievance *354 falls within the terms of the arbitration clause of the contract, it is the duty of the courts to determine whether the matter is arbitrable. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.