“no error of law”
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge
(2×)
See Doty v. Central Mutual Insurance Company, 186 So.2d 328, 386 (La.App. 3 Cir.) (per curiam), writ refused, 249 La. 486 , 187 So.2d 451 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thornton v. Moran
(2×)
See Doty v. Central Mutual Insurance Co., 186 So.2d 328 (3rd La.App., 1966), writs denied, 249 La. 486 , 187 So.2d 451 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lester v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
(2×)
See also Bernkrant v. Fowler, 55 Cal.2d 588 , 12 Cal.Rptr. 266 , 360 P.2d 906 (1961), an important recent decision frankly utilizing the approach of balancing the interests of the forum against those of the foreign jurisdiction as a guide to deciding choice-of-law problems. * * * * * * “We reach this result whether we regard the significant factor as being that the vehicle was sold to Louisiana residents for use in Louisiana, that the repossession actually took place thereafter in Louisiana, that Louisiana has a valid governmental interest in en *1212 forcing its public policy barring defici…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cora Lee DOTY
v.
CENTRAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.
v.
CENTRAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.
48274.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 23, 1966.
The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
SUMMERS, J., recused.