No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RITTENHOUSE PLAZA INC.
v.
Joan LICHTMAN v. Marvin Levin, C.P.A., Mary Duden, Stanton Oswald, Esquire, William Lederer, E. Gerald Riesenbach, Esquire, Jon Sirlin, Esquire, Dana Plon, Esquire and Peter Lesser, Esquire Petition of Joan Lichtman
v.
Joan LICHTMAN v. Marvin Levin, C.P.A., Mary Duden, Stanton Oswald, Esquire, William Lederer, E. Gerald Riesenbach, Esquire, Jon Sirlin, Esquire, Dana Plon, Esquire and Peter Lesser, Esquire Petition of Joan Lichtman
126 EM 2008.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 5, 2008.
Published opinion
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2008, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Review, and the “Emergency Motion to Amend Supersedeas,” which is treated as a Motion for Stay, are DENIED. Respondents’ Motion to Consolidate is DISMISSED AS MOOT.