green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy
(2×)
Gibson Co., 114 Conn. App. 210, 217 , 969 A.2d 179 , cert. denied, 292 Conn. 914 , 973 A.2d 663 (2009); accord Ryker v. Bethany, 97 Conn. App. 304, 314 , 904 A.2d 1227 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 932 , 909 A.2d 663 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
N. R. v. M. P.
See, e.g., Daddio v. O’Bara, 97 Conn. App. 286, 297 , 904 A.2d 259 (‘‘ample evidence before the court pertaining to the parties’ inability to cooperate and communicate with respect to the decisions regarding the minor child . . . supported the court’s conclusion that joint legal custody, which requires a level of cooperation between parents, was not in the child’s best interest’’), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 932 , 909 A.2d 957 (2006); see also Lugo v. Lugo, 176 Conn. App. 149, 153 , 168 A.3d 592 (2017) (in affirming trial court decision to award sole custody, this court noted that…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alpha Beta Capital Partners, L.P. v. Pursuit Investment Management, LLC
See Glinski v. Glinski, 26 Conn. App. 617, 623 , 602 A.2d 1070 (1992) (‘‘[w]hile the trial court may certainly draw adverse inferences from the failure of a party to submit the required financial information, it is under no obligation to do so’’ [emphasis added]); see also Szegda v. Szegda, 97 Conn. App. 426, 430 , 904 A.2d 1266 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 932 , 909 A.2d 959 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Radcliffe v. Radcliffe
Henin v. Henin, 26 Conn. App. 386, 392 , 601 A.2d 550 (1992); see also Szegda v. Szegda, 97 Conn. App. 426, 433 , 904 A.2d 1266 (record disclosed evidence supporting reasonable rationale for award of time limited alimony), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 932 , 909 A.2d 959 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Todd RYKER
v.
TOWN OF BETHANY et al.
v.
TOWN OF BETHANY et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 25, 2006.
Published
Max F. Brunswick, in support of the petition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn.App. 304, 904 A.2d 1227 (2006), is denied.