No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. Roger ST. AMAND, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION Et Al., Defendants, Appellees
v.
SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION Et Al., Defendants, Appellees
04-1019.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Aug 10, 2004.
Unpublished opinion
104 F. App'x 193
A. J. O’Donald, III for appellant., Kevin B. Callanan for appellees.
Selya, Dyk, Howard.
Published
PER CURIAM.
We have read the briefs in this case, listened attentively to oral arguments, and reviewed the record with care. We conclude, without serious question, that the district court appropriately granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The material facts are not genuinely in dispute. The legal principles that govern this case are well-settled and the district court applied those principles faultlessly. Consequently, we summarily affirm the judgment below, substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s bench decision of November 5, 2003, and its sub[*194] sequent memorandum and order dated November 6, 2003.
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27(c).