People v. Buonincontri, 843 N.E.2d 1143 (N.Y. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Buonincontri, 843 N.E.2d 1143 (N.Y. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: People v. Miranda, 77 A.D.3d 1323 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2010)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Nicole Buonincontri, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 15, 2005.
Published opinion
843 N.E.2d 1143
2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3346
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Labe M. Richman, New York City, for appellant., Michael E. Bongiorno, District Attorney, New City (Ellen O’Hara Woods of counsel), for respondent.
Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith Concur.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The defendant was informed on the record that she had the right to be present during questioning of a prospective juror concerning the ability to be fair and impartial. The Appellate Division[*727] properly determined that defendant failed to present an adequate record to overcome the presumption of regularity (see People v Velasquez, 1 NY3d 44, 48 [2003]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.