State v. Howard, 309 S.W.3d 446 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). · Go Syfert
State v. Howard, 309 S.W.3d 446 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Pierre D. HOWARD, Appellant
WD 70233.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
May 11, 2010.
Published opinion
309 S.W.3d 446
2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 583
2010 WL 1849318
Ruth Sanders, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Esq., and Robert J. Bartholomew, Esq., for respondent.
Hardwick, Smart, Ahuja.
Published

Order

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Pierre Howard appeals his conviction for forcible rape, Section 566.032, RSMo 2000. He contends the circuit court plainly erred in admitting evidence related to uncharged crimes. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).