Cited for
At page 402 cited at this page1 citing case
- Lloyd H. Hammond & Nancy Hammond v. Robert Toole & Tisha L. Toole & F & C Bank, 644 S.W.3d 289 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022).publishedPoint III – Alternative Relief In Point III, the Hammonds assert that the trial court erred in failing to award them monetary damages pursuant to their claim of unjust enrichment, arguing that “if the court was not going to set aside or re…
At page 403 cited at this page1 citing case
- Sch. Dist. of Kansas City v. Missouri Bd. of Fund Commissioners, 384 S.W.3d 238 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).publishedId. “[U]nless there is fraud or duress, the voluntary payment doctrine prohibits a person who voluntarily pays money with full knowledge of the facts from recovering money.” Id. at 403.
Other citing cases
- Charter Commc'ns Operating, LLC v. Satmap Inc., 569 S.W.3d 493 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
F.B., Respondent,
v.
Glen MARTIN, Appellant
v.
Glen MARTIN, Appellant
WD 71193.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Apr 13, 2010.
Published opinion
Jeremiah Kidwell, for Appellant., Kirby L. Minor, for Respondent.
Ellis, Howard, Witt.
Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM:Glen Martin appeals the trial court’s judgment granting a full order of protection to F.B. against Mr. Martin. On appeal, Mr. Martin claims that the trial court’s finding that he stalked F.B. is not supported by substantial evidence in that there was insufficient evidence of repeated conduct by Mr. Martin which would cause a reasonable fear of danger of physical harm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).