Edwards v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Pardons, 970 A.2d 425 (Pa. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Edwards v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Pardons, 970 A.2d 425 (Pa. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Saunder, S., No. 2012 EDA 2024 (Pa. Super. Ct. Nov. 25, 2025)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert A. EDWARDS, Appellant
v.
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PARDONS and Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Appellees
62 EAP 2008.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 20, 2009.
Published opinion
970 A.2d 425
2009 Pa. LEXIS 929
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Pinpoint authority: bottom 46%

ORDER

Notice of Appeal

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of May, 2009, it is hereby ordered that this appeal from the Commonwealth Court’s September 9, 2008 Order denying Appellant’s Application for Reargument en banc of the Commonwealth Court’s August 12, 2008 Order dismissing appellant’s petition for review is quashed for lack of jurisdiction. The Commonwealth Court’s September 9, 2008 Order denying reargument is not an appealable order. See, e.g., In re Merrick’s Estate, 432 Pa. 450, 247 A.2d 786, 787 (1968) (quashing appeal from unappealable court order denying reconsideration); Murkey v. Corbin, 115 Pa.Cmwlth. 258, 533 A.2d 1091 (1987), appeal denied, 520 Pa. 621, 554 A.2d 512 (1988) (same); Boden v. Tompkins, 306 Pa.Super. 494, 452 A.2d 833, 834 (1982) (same). Further, the appeal was untimely, as it was not filed within 30 days after the entry of the Commonwealth Courts August 12, 2008 Order dismissing appellants petition for review. See Pa.R.A.P. 903(a); Day v. Civil Service Comm’n of Carlisle, 593 Pa. 448, 931 A.2d 646, 651-52 (2007) (“The timeliness of an appeal involves jurisdiction.”).