green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
American First Federal, Inc. v. Gordon
(2×)
See Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Brookstone Court, LLC , 107 Conn.App. 340 , 352, 945 A.2d 548 , cert. denied, 288 Conn. 907 , 953 A.2d 651 (2008) (rejecting plaintiff's argument that court's attorney's fees award using lode-star method improper "[i]n the absence of the trial court identifying any specific time spent in the litigation by [the] plaintiff['s] counsel as being unreasonable ...." [internal quotation marks omitted] ). 12 We likewise do not find error in the court's observation that the redactions "affect, though do not eliminate, the probative value of" the affidav…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
D'Angelo Development & Construction Corp. v. Cordovano
(2×)
It is, therefore, the responsibility of the appellant to move for an articulation or rectification of the record where the trial court has failed to state the basis of a decision . . . .” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) DuBaldo Electric, LLC v. Montagno Construction, Inc., 119 Conn. App. 423, 448 , 988 A.2d 351 (2010); see also Practice Book § 61-10. “[W]here a party is dissatisfied with the trial court’s response to a motion for articulation, he may, and indeed under appropriate circumstances he must, seek immediate appeal of the rectification *188 memorandum to this court via the …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities Et Al.
v.
Brookstone Court, LLC, Et Al.
v.
Brookstone Court, LLC, Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 9, 2008.
Robert J. Kor, in support of the petition.
Vertefeuille.
Published
The petition by the plaintiff Kathy Sanchez for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 340 (AC 28221), is denied.
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.