green
Positive treatment
Issue: damages claimNJ ↗
Issue: seat belt defenseNJ ↗
Issue: heeding presumptionNJ ↗
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riley v. Keenan
(2×)
Compare State v. Wormley, 305 N.J.Super. 57, 65 , 701 A. 2d 944 (App.Div.1997) (evidence that a witness regularly used heroin and marijuana on weekends was "probably insufficient" under N.J.R.E. 406(a) to establish that he used drugs on a Thursday that he claimed he was robbed), certif. denied, 154 N.J. 607 , 713 A. 2d 498 (1998) with State v. Radziwil, 235 N.J.Super. 557, 563-66 , 563 A. 2d 856 (App.Div.1989) (testimony that over a four-year period the defendant patronized the same establishment nearly every weekend and invariably became intoxicated shortly after his arrival there, held admis…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Petro Radziwil, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Petro Radziwil, Defendant-Appellant
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 11, 1990.
William E. Norris, Designated Counsel,' argued the cause for appellant (Wilfredo Caraballo, Public Defender, attorney)., Janet Flanagan, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (.Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 235 N.J.Super. 557, 563 A.2d 856 (1989).
For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, and STEIN — 7.
Opposed — none.