Herbert Windsor v. United States, 184 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1950). · Go Syfert
Search
Herbert Windsor v. United States, 184 F.2d 184 (9th Cir. 1950). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herbert WINDSOR and Baeda E. Windsor, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
12468.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 1, 1950.
Published opinion
184 F.2d 184
Perry P, Yohe, North Hollywood, Cal., for appellant., Frank J. Plennessy, U. S. Atty., Rudolph J. Scholz, Asst. U. S. Atty.,-San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. ■ •
Mathews, Orr, Lemmon.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the District Court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous. See Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. They are not. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.