neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
published
0.4 score
Cited for
No citing cases on record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, Petitioner
v.
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CRAWFORD & COMPANY), Respondent
v.
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CRAWFORD & COMPANY), Respondent
145 MAL 2009.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 17, 2009.
Published opinion
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
[*638] ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Supersedeas Fund may deny reimbursement of medical treatment rendered before an insurer requested supersedeas, where the Workers’ Compensation Act only permits reimbursement of amounts paid as a result of a denial of supersedeas?