Joseph A. Ross v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 197 F.2d 525 (3d Cir. 1952). · Go Syfert
Joseph A. Ross v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 197 F.2d 525 (3d Cir. 1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph A. ROSS
v.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant
10655.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 26, 1952.
Published opinion
197 F.2d 525
1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2651
Bruce R. Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Dal-zell, Pringle, Bredin & Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant., Sylvan Libson, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Harrison & Libson, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Biggs, Ka-Lodner, Per Curiam, Staley.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record discloses substantial evidence of negligence to sustain the jury’s verdict against the defendant. Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 323 U.S. 600, 604, 65 S.Ct. 545, 89 L.Ed. 490. Cf. Lukon v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 131 F.2d 327, 328. The evidence also shows that the plaintiff’s act was not the sole efficient cause of the injury. A careful examination of the record and review of the briefs and oral argument convince us that the court below committed no prejudicial error. Consequently the judgment will be affirmed.