Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes, 948 A.2d 1285 (N.J. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes, 948 A.2d 1285 (N.J. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Raymond VAN DUREN, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Leigh E. RZASA-ORMES, Defendant-Appellant.
A-52 September Term, 2007.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 19, 2008.
948 A.2d 1285
Per Curiam.
Published

Kevin McNulty, argued the cause for appellant (Gibbons, Newark and Schepisi & McLaughlin, Englewood Cliffs, attorneys; Mr. McNulty, Michael R. Griffinger, Newark, John A. Schepisi, Englewood Cliffs and Glenn M. Finkel, on the briefs).

Steven R. Klein, Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent (Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, attorneys; Mr. Klein and Susan M. Usatine, on the briefs).

David G. Evans, Pittstown, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 394 N.J.Super. 254, 926 A.2d 372 (2007).

For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and HOENS—7.

Opposed—None.