Raymond v. Masterson v. Henry M. Lindsay, Superintendent, Dist. Reformatory, 219 F.2d 236 (4th Cir. 1955). · Go Syfert
Raymond v. Masterson v. Henry M. Lindsay, Superintendent, Dist. Reformatory, 219 F.2d 236 (4th Cir. 1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Raymond
v.
MASTERSON, Appellant, v. Henry M. LINDSAY, Superintendent, District Reformatory Et Al., Appellees
6897.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Feb 7, 1955.
Published opinion
219 F.2d 236
1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2902
No counsel for appellant., James R. Moore, Asst. U. S. Atty., Richmond, Va. (L. S. Parsons, Jr., U. S. Atty., Norfolk, Va., and Richard R. Ryder, Asst. U. S. Atty., Richmond, Va., on the brief), for appellees.
Parker, Soper, Dobie.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant was convicted of crime in the District of Columbia and sentenced to a term of imprisonment. He was released under the provisions of the “good time” statute, 18 U.S.C. § 4161, but before the expiration of his[*237] term was arrested for violation of the conditions of release and the Parole Board, after a hearing, entered an order requiring him to serve the remainder of the term. Appellant contends that the Parole Board was without jurisdiction in the premises, that, at all events, he was not subject to arrest for violation of the conditions of release unless such violation constituted a crime, and that the provision of the statute creating the status of prisoners under parole for those released under the “good time” provision is unconstitutional and void. There is no merit in any of these contentions. See United States ex rel. Nicholson v. Dillard, 4 Cir., 102 F.2d 94; Costner v. United States, 4 Cir., 180 F.2d 892; Hicks v. Reid, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 109, 194 F.2d 327, certiorari denied 344 U.S. 840, 73 S.Ct. 51, 97 L.Ed. 653; Gould v. Green, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 363, 141 F.2d 533; United States ex rel. Jacobs v. Bare, 6 Cir., 141 F.2d 480; Story v. Rives, 68 App.D.C. 325, 97 F.2d 182.

Affirmed.