No citing cases on record.
v.
Axel AXELROD, Appellant
In this automobile personal injuries case, counsel for appellant argued carefully and capably that the judgment is contrary to the weight of the evidence and to the Pennsylvania incontrovertible physical facts rule. We think that under the evidence these matters were for the jury and the trial court. With reference to the form of the verdict, the error, if any, was- unsubstantial.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.