Apollo v. Kim Anh Pham, 539 A.2d 1222 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Apollo v. Kim Anh Pham, 539 A.2d 1222 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BENJAMIN APOLLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
KIM ANH PHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division.
Dec 11, 1987.
Published opinion
539 A.2d 1222
Judges Deighan, Havey and Muir.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

Before Judges DEIGHAN, HAVEY and MUIR.

Edward J. Bowen argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Edward J. Bowen on the brief).

Robert C. Rivas argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Bergen County Legal Services, attorneys; Robert C. Rivas on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division denying a trial by jury is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Sorkow in his opinion reported at 192 N.J. Super. 427 (Ch.Div. 1983).

(The balance of the opinion which disposes of essentially factual issues in the same case decided by another judge is omitted from this publication.)