City of Paterson v. Paterson Gen. Hosp., 251 A.2d 131 (N.J. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
City of Paterson v. Paterson Gen. Hosp., 251 A.2d 131 (N.J. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Paterson, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
the Paterson General Hospital, Et Al., Defendants-Respondents; William F. Forbes, Et Al., Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the Paterson General Hospital, Et Al., Defendants-Respondents
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 17, 1969.
Published opinion
251 A.2d 131
1969 N.J. LEXIS 263
Mr. Adolph A. Romei argued the cause for appellant., Mr. John W. Griggs argued the cause for respondent Paterson General Hospital (Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys; Mr. Richard J. Ryan, on the brief)., Mr. Joseph L. Gonn and Mr. Arthur G. Dwyer argued the cause for respondent City of Paterson (Mr. Gonn, attorney; Mr. Dwyer, of counsel)., Mr. Kenneth M. Olex argued the cause for respondent Attorney General (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, attorney).
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

A petition for certification was filed to review the judgment of the Appellate Division approving a settlement of the litigation. We heard argument on the application as if certification was granted. The petition for certification is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed upon the agreement of the respondents that paragraph 5 of the contract does not mean that the Paterson General Hospital will be relieved, by virtue of that contract, of all obligation to the people of the City of Paterson at the end of the 20-year period mentioned in that paragraph.

For affirmance —- Chief Justice Weiftraub and Justices Jacobs, Erafcis, Proctor, Hale, Schettifo and Hahemaf—7.

For reversal—None.