State v. Hagerman, 700 S.E.2d 225 (N.C. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Hagerman, 700 S.E.2d 225 (N.C. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Raymond Charles HAGERMAN.
491A09.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 8, 2010.
Published opinion
700 S.E.2d 225
2010 N.C. LEXIS 732
Per Curiam.
Published

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Joseph Finarelli, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Jon W. Myers, Lexington, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in State v. Bowditch, ___ N.C. ___, 700 S.E.2d 1 (2010), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Chief Justice PARKER and Justices TIMMONS-GOODSON and HUDSON dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Bowditch, ___ N.C. ___, 700 S.E.2d 1 (2010).