Berry v. Dodson, Nunley & Taylor, P.C., 729 S.W.2d 690 (Tex. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Berry v. Dodson, Nunley & Taylor, P.C., 729 S.W.2d 690 (Tex. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
80 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Safeway, Incorporated v. PDX, Incorporated (ca5, 2017-01-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Safeway, Incorporated v. PDX, Incorporated
5th Cir. · 2017 · confidence medium
Singleton, 729 S.W.2d at 691. 15 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corp. v. Firstgroup America, Inc. (2×)
Wash. · 2012 · confidence medium
Petroleum Corp., 729 S.W.2d 690, 691 (Tex. 1987) (emphasis added). 8 ¶43 More importantly, we have not joined any such trend.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Quorum Health Resources, L.L.C. v. Maverick County Hospital District (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
5th Cir. · 2002 · confidence medium
Ethyl, 725 S.W.2d at 708 (no indemnification for concurrent negligence when sole negligence of indemnitor included); Singleton, 729 S.W.2d at 691 (no indemnification for concurrent negligence when sole negligence of indemnitee excluded); Texas Utils., 893 S.W.2d at 741 (same); see also Houston Lighting & Power, 890 S.W.2d at 458 (no indemnification for strict liability when negligence of indemnitee included); Fina, 200 F.3d at 273 (no indemnification for strict liability when gross negligence of indemnitee excluded).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Quorum Health Resources, L.L.C. v. Maverick County Hospital District (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
5th Cir. · 2002 · confidence medium
Ethyl, 725 S.W.2d at 708 (no indemnification for concurrent negligence when sole negligence of indemnitor included); Singleton, 729 S.W.2d at 691 (no indemnification for concurrent negligence when sole negligence of indemnitee excluded); Texas Utils., 893 S.W.2d at 741 (same); see also Houston Lighting & Pow *468 er, 890 S.W.2d at 458 (no indemnification for strict liability when negligence of in-demnitee included); Fina, 200 F.3d at 273 (no indemnification for strict liability when gross negligence of indemnitee excluded).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Webb v. Lawson-Avila Construction, Inc. (2×)
Tex. App. · 1995 · confidence medium
Petroleum Corp., 729 S.W.2d 690, 691 (Tex.1987) (agreement to indemnify for any and all losses arising in connection with the work to be performed, excepting only claims resulting from owner's sole negligence, does not satisfy the express negligence doctrine).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ard v. Gemini Exploration Co.
Tex. App. · 1994 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Ethyl, 725 S.W.2d at 705 (indemnity provision only clearly stated that it covered in-demnitor's negligence, not indemnitee's); Gulf Coast Masonry, Inc. v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 739 S.W.2d 239, 240 (Tex.1987) (indemnity provision did not specifically refer to negligence); Singleton v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp., 729 S.W.2d 690, 691 (Tex.1987) (the broadly worded provision did not state there was indemnity for concurrent negligence).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Parker v. Enserch Corp.
Tex. App. · 1989 · confidence medium
It argues that the clause containing the actual reference to “negligence” is attached to a broad, general statement of the so-called assumption of liability and, thus, is no different from that disapproved in Singleton v. Crown Central, 729 S.W.2d 690, 691 (Tex.1987), where the general indemnity clause was followed by an “exception” for sole negligence.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Whitson v. Goodbodys, Inc.
Tex. App. · 1989 · confidence medium
Petroleum Corp., 729 S.W.2d 690, 691 (Tex. 1987); Monsanto Co. v. Owens-Coming Fiberglass Corp., 764 S.W.2d 293, 296 (Tex.App.— Houston (1st Dist.] 1988, no writ); B-F-W Constr.
discussed Cited "see" Gamboa v. Shaw
Tex. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence bake:actor
See Berry v. Dodson, Nunley & Taylor, P.C., 717 S.W.2d 716, 718 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1986), judgm’t vacated by agr., 729 S.W.2d 690 (Tex.1987); see also Thompson,, 859 S.W.2d at 622 ; Thomas, 847 S.W.2d at 305 ; Dickey v. Jansen, 731 S.W.2d 581, 582 (Tex.App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Bell v. Manning, 613 S.W.2d 335, 339 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.).
discussed Cited "see" Brooks v. Zebre (2×)
Wyo. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Berry v. Dodson, Nunley & Taylor, P.C., 729 S.W.2d 690 (Tex.1987).
discussed Cited "see" Continental Steel Co. v. H.A. Lott, Inc. (2×)
Tex. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Singleton v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp., 729 S.W.2d 690, 691 (Tex.1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Julia A. BERRY Et Al.
v.
DODSON, NUNLEY & TAYLOR, P.C., Et Al.
C-5896.
Texas Supreme Court.
Feb 25, 1987.
729 S.W.2d 690
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Joint motion of the parties filed herein on February 20, 1987 having been duly considered, it is ordered that the joint motion be, and hereby is, granted.

The petitioners’ application for writ of error having been granted previously on January 7, 1987, the judgments of the courts below are set aside and the cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of judgment pursuant to the settlement agreement of the parties.