Hubbard v. State, 841 S.W.2d 33 (Tex. App. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Hubbard v. State, 841 S.W.2d 33 (Tex. App. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (55 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ex Parte Rudy Garza v. the State of Texas, No. 02-25-00233-CR (May 7, 2026)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 33 Determining mootness of pre-trial habeas corpus application31 citing casesTex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.25 citing courts put it this way · 27 listed here
  • Ex Parte Rudy Garza v. the State of Texas, No. 02-25-00233-CR (May 7, 2026).unpublished
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Ex Parte Ismael Juarez-Rico v. ., No. 04-23-00326-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 19, 2025).unpublished 2 cites
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Ex Parte Cesar Espino-Juarez v. ., No. 04-23-00325-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 19, 2025).unpublished
    See Martinez v. State, 826 S.W.2d 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (dismissing petition for discretionary review where the applicant’s habeas petition was moot); Ex parte Guerrero, 99 S.W.3d 852, 853 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.…
  • Ex Parte Daniel Troy LeBlanc v. the State of Texas, No. 09-24-00102-CR (Tex. App.—Beaumont Aug. 28, 2024).unpublished
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Ex Parte Justin Scott Meads, No. 10-14-00254-CR (Tex. App.—Waco Nov. 20, 2014).unpublished
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Ex Parte Bradley Harold Andrews, No. 02-13-00140-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 27, 2014).unpublished
    (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Eligah Darnell v. State, No. 02-10-00208-CR, 2010 WL 5019589 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 9, 2010).unpublished 2 cites
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Ex Parte Horton, 305 S.W.3d 200 (Tex. App.—Waco 2009).published 3 cites
    (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Pedro Leon Shepherd v. State, No. 01-09-00301-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 28, 2009).unpublished
    (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Shawn Debose v. State, No. 01-08-01014-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 12, 2009).unpublished
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
Show 17 more citing cases
  • in Re Angel Soliz, Sr., No. 01-08-00877-CR, 2008 WL 5392029 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 19, 2008).unpublished
    (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • in Re Angel Soliz, Jr., No. 01-08-00878-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 19, 2008).unpublished
    (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Jayson Brent Dickinson v. State, No. 01-08-00061-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 19, 2008).unpublished
    (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Miguel Angel Vasquez v. State, No. 13-04-00169-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Aug. 28, 2007).unpublished
    (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Jose Mendoza v. Ex Parte, No. 01-06-00804-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 17, 2007).unpublished
    (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Kniatt v. State, 206 S.W.3d 657 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).published 4 cites
    (double jeopardy question)
  • Kniatt, Ex Parte Nathan Andrew, No. PD-0323-05 (Tex. Crim. App. June 21, 2006).published 2 cites
    (double jeopardy question)
  • Neville Sapp v. State, No. 01-05-00159-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 12, 2006).unpublished
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Henry Levon Smith v. State, No. 01-05-00504-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 13, 2005).unpublished
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Craig Frances, Jr. v. State, No. 01-04-00693-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 21, 2004).unpublished
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Booker Thomas Bonner, Jr. v. State, No. 01-03-00667-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 17, 2004).unpublished
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Tessa Ann Jenkins v. State, No. 01-03-00208-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] July 24, 2003).unpublished
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Enard v. State, 513 S.W.3d 206 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016).published
    (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Ex Parte Calvin T. Powell, No. 14-14-00457-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 5, 2014).published
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Ex Parte Calvin T. Powell, No. 14-14-00325-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 5, 2014).published
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Ex Parte: Jose Manuel Guzman, No. 08-11-00149-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Nov. 21, 2011).published
    (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.)
  • Ex Parte David Lorenza Joyner v. State, No. 14-11-00775-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 15, 2011).unpublished
    (Keller, P.J., concurring)
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
  • Ex Parte Andrew Pete, No. 01-22-00259-CR, 2022 WL 16985609 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 17, 2022).unpublished 2 cites
  • State v. Terry Golding, 398 S.W.3d 745 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sherry HUBBARD, Appellant,
v.
the STATE of Texas, Appellee
A14-92-00058-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas.
Oct 1, 1992.
Published opinion
841 S.W.2d 33
1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 2567
1992 WL 240639
Mary E. Conn, Houston, for appellant., Kimberly Aperauch Stelter, Houston, for appellee.
Brown, Sears, Ellis.
Cited by 36 opinions  |  Published

OPINION

SEARS, Justice.

Sherry Hubbard appeals from a denial of her pre-trial application for writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the application as moot.

Ms. Hubbard was charged by way of information with assault. Tex.Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1). On January 16, 1992, she was brought to trial, a jury was selected and sworn, and she entered a plea of not guilty. During trial the court granted the State’s motion for mistrial based upon an alleged defense violation of the State’s motion in limine. The State intended to immediately retry the case. Appellant filed an application for a pre-trial writ of habeas corpus in the county criminal court to discharge her from the “threat of further prosecution.” The trial court denied relief and appellant filed a writ in this court. Appellant went to trial five days later. This court did not have time to rule on the writ of habeas corpus before appellant was convicted.

Although we do not agree with the trial court’s decision to put the defendant to a second trial in such a short period of time, that issue is not before us. Consistent with Martinez v. State, 826 S.W.2d 620 (Tex.Crim.App.1992) we find that her pretrial writ is moot because the appellant has already been convicted. Appellant points out in her post-submission brief that a person can raise a double jeopardy issue for the first time on a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. We agree. However, appellant has not filed a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus, but instead is appealing a denial of a pre-trial writ of habeas corpus. We cannot discharge the appellant from the “threat of further prosecution” since she has already been prosecuted and no trial is currently pending. “Where the premise of a habeas corpus application is destroyed by subsequent developments, the legal issues raised thereunder are rendered moot.” Saucedo v. State, 795 S.W.2d 8 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, no pet.). An appropriate remedy lies by way of appeal. Id.

[*34] Appellant’s writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.