neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
published
0.2 score
Cited for
No citing cases on record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
LAUNDRY, CLEANING & LINEN WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 218, LAUNDRY, DRY CLEANING & DYE HOUSEWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, Respondent
v.
LAUNDRY, CLEANING & LINEN WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 218, LAUNDRY, DRY CLEANING & DYE HOUSEWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, Respondent
14257.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Dec 19, 1960.
Published opinion
Richard J. Scupi, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., on brief, for petitioner., Robert L. Mitchell, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.
McAllister, Martin, Weick.
Published
ORDER.
This case has been heard and considered upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order, directed against the respondent union;
And it appearing from the record in the case that the findings of fact of the National Labor Relations Board are supported by substantial evidence, and that the conclusions of law of the Board upon which its order was based are soundly reasoned;
The order of the Labor Board is directed to be enforced in entirety.