Reading Co. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., 295 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Reading Co. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., 295 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Three Rivers Rock Co. v. M/V MARTIN, 401 F. Supp. 15 (E.D. Mo. 1975)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases4 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reading Company
v.
Pope & Talbot, Inc. And Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation
13603_1.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Oct 25, 1961.
Published opinion
295 F.2d 40
Published

295 F.2d 40

READING COMPANY, Appellant
v.
POPE & TALBOT, INC. and Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation.

No. 13603.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 17, 1961.
Decided Oct. 25, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge.

Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Thomas F. Mount, J. Welles Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Elmer C. Maddy, New York City (Krusen, Evans & Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., and Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, Roy C. Megargel, New York City, Claus G. U. Claesson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee Pope & Talbot, Inc.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

[*~40–41]1

Upon review of the record we find no error.

2

The Interlocutory Decree of the District Court of March 30, 1961, 192 F.Supp. 663, will be affirmed.