Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Agan
(2×)
The proof amply supports the finding that defendant is a vicious, cold-blooded killer who intentionally murdered the deceased victim, and the People attempted to demonstrate that the killing constituted witness elimination murder in that he killed "a victim who 'was a witness to a crime committed on a prior occasion and [did so] . . . for the purpose of preventing the intended victim's testimony in any criminal action'" ( People v Cahill , 2 NY3d 14, 56 [2003] [emphasis omitted], quoting Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [v]; see People v Adamson , 47 AD3d 318, 322-323 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 807 …
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Dolan (Patrick)
Defense counsel then announced that "I'm going to serve and file a 30.30 motion." Under these circumstances, we agree with Criminal Court that "defense counsel's tactics deprived the prosecution of reasonable notice of the motion, and that the defendant waived his speedy trial claim by announcing his readiness ... and by failing to request an adjournment when the People moved the case to trial that morning" ( People v Harvall , 196 AD2d 553, 555 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 896 [1993]); see People v Alvarez, 46 AD3d 476 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 807 [2008]; People v Goberdhan , 249 AD2d 324 [1998…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Houghtaling
The time restrictions for filing a motion to dismiss “are not casual” (People v Davidson, 98 NY2d at 739 ; see People v. Jackson, 48 AD3d 891, 893 [2008], Iv denied 10 NY3d 841 [2008]), and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction as to this unpreserved argument (see People v Adamson, 47 AD3d 318 , 322 n 5 [2007], Iv denied 10 NY3d 807 [2008]; People v Vanderpool, 217 AD2d 716, 717 [1995], Iv denied 86 NY2d 847 [1995]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Suffolk Regional Off-Track Betting Corporation, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
New York State Racing and Wagering Board Et Al., Appellants-Respondents. (And Four Other Related Proceedings.)
v.
New York State Racing and Wagering Board Et Al., Appellants-Respondents. (And Four Other Related Proceedings.)
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 25, 2008.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Motion by the Saratoga Harness Horsepersons’ Association for leave to file a memorandum of law amicus curiae on the motions for leave to appeal herein granted and the memorandum of law is accepted as filed.