Matter of Anderson v. Town of Chili Plan. Bd., 913 N.E.2d 407 (NY 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Matter of Anderson v. Town of Chili Plan. Bd., 913 N.E.2d 407 (NY 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Thomas Anderson Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Town of Chili Planning Board Et Al., Respondents
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 30, 2009.
913 N.E.2d 407
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse (Janet D. Callahan of counsel), for appellants., Keith E. O’Toole, Spencerport, for Town of Chili Planning Board, respondent., Ward Norris Heller & Reidy LLP, Rochester (Jeffrey J. Harridine of counsel), for Metalico Rochester, Inc., respondent.
Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, respondent Planning Board’s determinations issuing a conditional use permit and a negative declaration annulled and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, with directions to remand to the Planning Board for further proceedings for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (59 AD3d 1017, 1019-1020 [2009]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.