11 N.Y.3d at 815 OPINION OF THE COURT Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Orange County, with directions to dismiss the proceeding. Under the…2 citing cases
- Matter of Pidot v. Macedo, 141 A.D.3d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2016).publishedThe Supreme Court properly concluded, based, inter alia, on the concession of Pidot’s counsel, that it would be impossible to grant Pidot the relief he specifically requested in his petition, namely, to include his name on the June 28, 201…
- Matter of Semple v. Laine, 121 A.D.3d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2014).publishedOrdered that the appeals from the final orders are dismissed, without costs or disbursements. *799 Under the circumstances of this case, it would be impossible, if this Court were to entertain the merits, to render meaningful relief in acc…
11 N.Y.3d at 814 cited at this page1 citing case
- Vaiselberg v. Radin, 2025 NY Slip Op 31643(U) (N.Y. Sup. Kings 2025).unpublishedNO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/06/2025 2024]; see also, Matter of Hunter v Orange County Bd. of Elections, 11 NY3d 813,814 (200 8]); Matter ofSemple v Laine, 121 AD3 d 798, 799 [2d Dept 2014]).
v.
Orange County Board of Elections, Respondent, and Robert A. Onofry, Appellant
[*815] OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Orange County, with directions to dismiss the proceeding. Under the circumstances of this case, it would be impossible, if this Court were to entertain the merits, to render meaningful relief in compliance with the Election Law.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.