People v. Riley, 845 N.E.2d 1288 (NY 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Riley, 845 N.E.2d 1288 (NY 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events (62 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Anderson (nyappdiv, 2023-10-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Anderson
N.Y. App. Div. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
Here, the charged crime "occurred in the privacy of the home and the facts are not easily unraveled" ( People v Hall , 182 AD3d 1023, 1024 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 35 NY3d 1045 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Riley , 23 AD3d 1077, 1077 [4th Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 817 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Highsmith
N.Y. App. Div. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
We reject that contention inasmuch as DLRA-1 “does not permit the court to disturb the underlying class A-I felony conviction” (People v Watts, 58 AD3d 648, 649 [2009], lv dismissed 12 NY3d 763 [2009]; see People v Quinones, 22 AD3d 218 , 219 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 817 [2006]; see generally People v Utsey, 7 NY3d 398, 404 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Kayumov
N.Y. App. Div. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although the felony complaint, indictment, voluntary disclosure form, arraignment transcript, and search warrant affidavit disclosed to defendant provided him with "detailed information about the sequence of events leading up to his arrest" ( People v Lawson-Varsier , 138 AD3d 486, 487 [1st Dept 2016]; see also People v Roberts , 23 AD3d 245, 245-246 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 817 [2006]), he failed to controvert the specific information provided by the People or to establish any other basis for suppression ( see People v Jones , 95 NY2d 721, 729 [2001]; see generally People v Mendoza ,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Jordan
N.Y. App. Div. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
In cases outside of the Catu context, we have consistently held to the view that a defendant’s failure to timely appeal from the underlying judgment jurisdictionally forecloses any challenge to the plea proceeding on an appeal from a resentence (see People v McMillan, 228 AD2d 166 [1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 1070 [1996]; People v Lugo, 176 AD2d 177 [1991]; see also People v Quinones, 22 AD3d 218 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 817 [2006]; People v Ramirez, 5 AD3d 102 [2004], lv denied 2 NY3d 805 [2004]; People v Williams, 192 AD2d 322 [1993]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Valencia
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Nor are we persuaded that County Court abused its discretion in declining to alter defendant’s sentences to run concurrently because the same sentences imposed upon his codefendant were imposed concurrently, inasmuch as defendant bore a higher level of culpability for the crimes of which the two were convicted (id. at 876; see People v Grajales, 294 AD2d 657, 659 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 697 [2002]; see also People v Provost, 25 AD3d 1016, 1017 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 817 [2006]; People v Purcell, 8 AD3d 821, 822 [2004]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
People
v.
Riley
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 17, 2006.
845 N.E.2d 1288
Published

Application in criminal case for leave to appeal denied. (Read, J.)