green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Lee
In our view, “[t]he probative value of this . . . evidence outweighed the prejudice, and the court delivered adequate instructions to the jury regarding the proper use of this information” (People v Faccio, 33 AD3d at 1042 ; see People v Mullings, 23 AD3d 756, 758-759 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 756 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Peele
“The court may permit further inquiry on a subject if the defense ‘opens the door’ by providing incomplete or misleading information, although such inquiry must be limited to only such ‘otherwise inadmissible evidence [as] is reasonably necessary to correct the misleading impression’ ” (People v Greene, 13 AD3d 991, 993 [2004], lv denied 5 NY3d 789 [2005], quoting People v Massie, 2 NY3d 179, 184 [2004]; see People v Mullings, 23 AD3d 756, 759 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 756 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Cole
That contention “is actually a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution . . . , [which] is encompassed by the valid waiver of the right to appeal” (People v Wilson, 38 AD3d 1348, 1348 [2007]; see also People v Montstream, 21 AD3d 1353 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 756 [2005]; People v King, 20 AD3d 907 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 829 [2005]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
MAXWELL
v.
MAXWELL
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 30, 2005.
843 N.E.2d 1164
Published
Application in criminal case for leave to appeal denied. (G.B. Smith, J.).