United States v. Gilberto Santana, 306 F.2d 880 (2d Cir. 1962). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Gilberto Santana, 306 F.2d 880 (2d Cir. 1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Joseph Aguilar Gaitan v. United States, 317 F.2d 494 (10th Cir. 1963)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Gilberto Santana
27736.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Aug 21, 1962.
Published opinion
306 F.2d 880
Published

306 F.2d 880

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Gilberto SANTANA, Appellant.

No. 403.

Docket 27736.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued August 21, 1962.

Decided August 21, 1962.

Arnold Wallach, New York City (Harold O. N. Frankel, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Arthur I. Rosett, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, New York City, Robert J. Geniesse, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

[*~880–882]1

We affirm the judgment of conviction. There was abundant evidence to support Judge Murphy's conclusion, sitting without a jury, that the appellant had control of the narcotics and his finding that the appellant was guilty as charged of violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174.

[*~881–882]2

Affirmed.