Vadala v. Carroll, 450 N.E.2d 238 (N.Y. 1983). · Go Syfert
Vadala v. Carroll, 450 N.E.2d 238 (N.Y. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Cited for
59 N.Y.2d at 752 cited at this page1 citing case
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul D. Vadala Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Randall Carroll, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
May 11, 1983.
Published opinion
450 N.E.2d 238
1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3102
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Craig P. Schlanger for appellant., Francis Maloney, Jr., for respondent.
Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons Concur Judge Fuchsberg Taking No Part.
Cited by 19 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division’s determination that it was error to have set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence, although appealable, is beyond the scope of our review (Aiello v Garahan, 58 NY2d 1078; Mongelli Carting Co. v Nassau Ins. Co., 57 NY2d 649; Gutin v Mascali & Sons, 11 NY2d 97; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the[*753] New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], § 148, p 588). Due to the posture in which this case comes before us, there must be an automatic affirmance (Goehle v Town of Smithtown, 55 NY2d 995; Rochester Tel. Corp. v Green Is. Constr. Corp., 51 NY2d 788; Pfohl v Wipperman, 34 NY2d 597).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur; Judge Fuchsberg taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.