People v. Fortt, 324 N.E.2d 369 (N.Y. 1974). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Fortt, 324 N.E.2d 369 (N.Y. 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Melendez (nyappdiv, 2016-06-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Melendez
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
Such references are “completely unnecessary and possibly misleading” (People v Fortt, 35 NY2d at 922). *424 Here, the ADA’s testimony that the grand jury that indicted defendant had heard testimony, had not asked to subpoena additional witnesses, and had voted to “go forward” fall within this prohibition.
cited Cited "see, e.g." People v. Smith
N.Y. App. Div. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
That is what was done in this particular case’ ” (People v Evans, 63 AD2d 653, 654 ; see also, People v Fortt, 35 NY2d 921 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Timothy Fortt, Also Known as Timothy Porter, Appellant.
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 20, 1974.
324 N.E.2d 369
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

Joseph B. Hirschfield for appellant.

Carl A. Vergari, District Attorney (James M. Rose and Stephen C. Unsino of counsel), for respondent.

Stephen J. Pittari and Robert W. Stieve for Legal Aid Society of Westchester County, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS.

Order reversed and a new trial ordered on the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division.