neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
Issue: Blakely-based challengeOR ↗
Issue: agency ruleOR ↗
Issue: context of an unpreserved challengeOR ↗
0.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Ramirez
But see State v. Vigil, 197 Or App 407, 412 , 106 P3d 656 , adh’d to as modified on recons, 199 Or App 525 , 112 P3d 441 , rev den, 339 Or 156 (2005) (unpreserved Blakely-based challenge to denial of consideration for sentence modification programs under ORS 137.750 is not plain error).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JORDAN
v.
SAIF CORP.
v.
SAIF CORP.
S52486.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Aug 9, 2005.
Cited by 23 opinions | Published
Appellant's petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Dougan v. SAIF, 339 Or. 1, 115 P.3d 242 (2005).