Palmetto Pump & Irrigation Co. v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, 313 F.2d 220 (5th Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Palmetto Pump & Irrigation Co. v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, 313 F.2d 220 (5th Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PALMETTO PUMP AND IRRIGATION COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Laurie W. TOMLINSON, District Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Florida, Appellee
19771.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 6, 1963.
Published opinion
313 F.2d 220
1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6210
Stanley W. Rosenkranz, George W. Ericksen, Tampa, Fla., for appellant., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Edward F. Boardman, U. S. Atty., Thomas J. Hanlon, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., Karl Schmeidler, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Brown, Gewin, Bell.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued to recover income taxes paid which it alleged were erroneously and illegally assessed. The issue presented was what amounted to reasonable compensation for corporate officers under 26 U.S.C.A. § 162. This appeal is from the judgment entered on a jury verdict for appellee.

We are convinced from a careful review that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict, that no prejudicial error exists, and that the appeal is without merit. It follows that the judgment should be and is

Affirmed.