Sax Enter., Inc. v. William F. Usher & G. E. Shingledecker, as Trs. for Saxony Props., Inc., Debtor, 327 F.2d 666 (5th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Sax Enter., Inc. v. William F. Usher & G. E. Shingledecker, as Trs. for Saxony Props., Inc., Debtor, 327 F.2d 666 (5th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Grantham v. Beatrice Co. (ilnd, 1991-10-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Grantham v. Beatrice Co.
N.D. Ill. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co., 210 F.Supp. 644, 651 (N.D.Ga.1962), aff'd, 327 F.2d 666 (5th Cir.1964).
cited Cited "see" General Finance Corporation, Bankrupt, by Ronald W. Wright, Trustee v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York
8th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Georgia Casualty & Surety v. Seaboard Surety Co., 210 F.Supp. 644 (N.D.Ga., 1962) affirmed, 327 F.2d 666 (C.A.5, 1964); 13 Am.Jur. §§ 865-66; 19 Am.Jur.2d, Corporations, § 836; New York, L.
cited Cited "see" Dorsey v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of Worcester, Mass.
N.D. Ga. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 644 , 5 Cir., 327 F.2d 666 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sax Enterprises, Inc.
v.
William F. Usher and G. E. Shingledecker, as Trustees for Saxony Properties, Inc., Debtor
20141.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 17, 1964.
327 F.2d 666
Published

327 F.2d 666

SAX ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant,
v.
William F. USHER and G. E. Shingledecker, as Trustees for
Saxony Properties, Inc., Debtor, Appellees.

No. 20141.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 19, 1964, Rehearing Denied March 17, 1964.

W. G. Ward, Miami, Fla., Ward & Ward, Miami, Fla., of counsel for appellant.

George C. Bolles, George F. Gilleland, Bolles and Prunty, Richard M. Winokur, Miami, Fla., for trustees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS[1] and JONES, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

No prejudicial error appearing in the record of this cause, the order of the district court from which this appeal has been taken is

2

Affirmed.

1

Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation