C. C. Thomas v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co., 327 F.2d 667 (10th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
C. C. Thomas v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co., 327 F.2d 667 (10th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Hanson (cob, 2002-04-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In Re Hanson
Bankr.D. Colo. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
The Courts, instead, adopted the generally accepted notions that a “debt” is (a) essentially synonymous with a “claim” and (b) a claim qualifies as liquidated, if it is readily calculable or ascertainable as to amount, and (c) a debtor’s dispute, defenses or counterclaims, do not affect *597 the character and classification of claim as being liquidated. [In re Blehm, 33 B.R. 678, 679 (Bankr.D.Colo.1983); In re Burgat, 68 B.R. 408, 411 (Bankr.D.Colo. 1986); In re Sylvester, 19 B.R. 671, 673 (9th Cir. BAP 1982)]; See, In re Thomas, 211 F.Supp. 187, 192 (D.Colo.1962), aff'd, 327 F.2d 66…
cited Cited "see" Matter of McGovern
Bankr. N.D. Ind. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Sylvester, 19 B.R. 671, 673 (9th Cir.B.A.P.1982) (citing In re Thomas, 211 F.Supp. 187, 192 (D.Colo.1962), aff'd, 327 F.2d 667 (10th Cir.1964)).
cited Cited "see" In Re Clark
Bankr.D. Colo. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
Blehm, supra at 679; Burgat, supra at 411 ; In re Sylvester, supra at 673 ; See, In re Thomas, 211 F.Supp. 187, 192 (D.Colo.1962), aff'd, 327 F.2d 667 (10th Cir.1964).
discussed Cited "see" Estelle v. Dorrough (2×)
SCOTUS · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See 327 F. 2d 667 (CA5 1964); 344 F. 2d 125 (CA5 1965); 397 F. 2d 811 (CA5), cert. denied, 394 U. S. 1019 (1969); 440 F. 2d 1063 (CA5), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 840 (1971); 440 F. 2d 1336 (CA5), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 915 (1971). [4] The decision of the District Court is unreported.
discussed Cited "see" Dorrough v. Estelle
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 667 ; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1965, 344 F.2d 125 ; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 887 , aff’d en banc, 1968, 397 F.2d 811 , cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1019 , 89 S.Ct. 1637 , 23 L.Ed.2d 44 ; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F.2d 1336 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 915 , 92 S.Ct. 239 , 30 L.Ed.2d 190 . .
discussed Cited "see" Jerry Mack Dorrough v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Tdc
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 667 ; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1965, 344 F.2d 125 ; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 884 , aff'd en banc, 1968, 397 F.2d 811 , cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1019 , 89 S.Ct. 1637 , 23 L.Ed.2d 44 ; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F.2d 1336 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 915 , 92 S.Ct. 239 , 30 L.Ed.2d 190 2 Dorrough has also previously sought to void the detainer, by arguing that the State lost jurisdiction over him by surrendering him to federal authorities.
discussed Cited "see" Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 667 ; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1965, 344 F.2d 125 ; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 887 , aff’d en banc, 1968, 397 F.2d 811 , cert. denied, 1969, 394 U.S. 1019 , 89 S.Ct. 1637 , 23 L.Ed.2d 44 .
discussed Cited "see" Jerry Mack Dorrough v. United States of America, No. 30478 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprices, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 327 F.2d 667 ; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1965, 344 F.2d 125 ; Dorrough v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 887 , aff'd en banc, 1968, 397 F.2d 811 , cert. denied, 1969, 394 U.S. 1019 , 89 S.Ct. 1637 , 23 L.Ed.2d 44 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fisher v. Bank Leumi Trust Co. of New York (In Re MacFarlane Webster Associates)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
Dinerman, 301 F.2d at 466; 3 Collier ¶ 59.36; see also In re Thomas, 211 F.Supp. 187, 191 (D.Colo.1962), aff'd per curiam sub nom Thomas v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co., 327 F.2d 667 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 827 , 85 S.Ct. 55 , 13 L.Ed.2d 36 (1964); In re Acorn Elec.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
C. C. Thomas
v.
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company, Webb & Knapp, Inc., Murph's Express, a Partnership, E. T. Cressman, Peter B. Taylor, Rice's Food Store, and Dawson, Nagel, Sherman and Howard, in the Matter of C. C. Thomas, Alleged Bankrupt
7286_1.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Feb 17, 1964.
327 F.2d 667
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

327 F.2d 667

C. C. THOMAS, Appellant,
v.
YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE COMPANY, Webb & Knapp, Inc., Murph's Express, a partnership, E. T. Cressman, Peter B. Taylor, Rice's Food Store, and Dawson, Nagel, Sherman and Howard, Appellees.
In the Matter of C. C. THOMAS, Alleged Bankrupt.

No. 7286.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

February 17, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, William E. Doyle, Judge.

1

Allen A. Thoreen and Clayton H. Morrison, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

2

Richard H. Shaw, of Modesitt & Shaw, Denver, Colo., for appellee Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.

3

Gerald M. Quiat, of Quiat, Seeman, Quiat & Woods, Denver, Colo., for appellee Webb & Knapp, Inc.

4

No appearances for other appellees.

5

Before BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges, and KERR, District Judge.

6

PER CURIAM.

7

A careful examination of the record in this case and consideration of the briefs and arguments of the parties convince us that the findings and decision of the district court were correct. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed on the basis of that court's opinion reported in 211 F.Supp. 187.