Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc., 328 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc., 328 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc., 375 F.2d 402 (5th Cir. 1967)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
MOONEY AIRCRAFT, INC., Respondent
20445_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 7, 1964.
Published opinion
328 F.2d 426
1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6449
Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Robert B. Schwartz, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner., Hal Rachal, Midland, Tex., for respondent.
Brown, Wisdom, Bell.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The sole question on appeal is whether substantial evidence in the record, taken as a whole, supports the finding of the National Labor Relations Board that the respondent discharged a certain employee for union activity in violation of Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act. After a careful study of the record and the briefs filed in this case, we agree that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding. It is therefore ordered that the Board’s order be enforced.