Robert E. Lee Gresham, Sr. v. United States, 329 F.2d 779 (10th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Robert E. Lee Gresham, Sr. v. United States, 329 F.2d 779 (10th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert E. Lee GRESHAM, Sr., Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
7562.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Apr 6, 1964.
Published opinion
329 F.2d 779
1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5827
Merrick S. Wing, Denver, Colo., for appellant., Lawrence A. McSoud, Asst. U. S. Atty. (John M. Imel, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
Breitenstein, Hill, Per Curiam, Seth.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1)
PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted, found guilty by a jury, and sentenced for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2115. In his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 he asserts deprivation of constitutional rights because of the insufficiency of the indictment. An examination of the indictment establishes that it satisfies the principles summarized in Clay v. United[*780] States, 10 Cir., 326 F.2d 196, 198. The motion raised only a question of law and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to appoint counsel or grant a hearing.

Affirmed.