Robert R. Deitch v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden, Ohio Penitentiary, 337 F.2d 424 (6th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Robert R. Deitch v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden, Ohio Penitentiary, 337 F.2d 424 (6th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert R. DEITCH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
E. L. MAXWELL, Warden, Ohio Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee
15827.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Oct 10, 1964.
Published opinion
337 F.2d 424
1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4189
Eugene W. Youngs (Court appointed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant., John Cianflona, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio (William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.
O'Sullivan, Edwards, Starr.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Petitioner pleaded guilty in the Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas to the'offense of armed robbery and was sentenced to 10 to 25 years in the state penitentiary.

By petition for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, petitioner sought to raise federal constitutional questions relative to the constitutionality of the Ohio statute, Ohio Revised Code, § 5145.01, under which he was sentenced.

The record is clear that these issues have not been presented to the Ohio Supreme Court. The District Judge dismissed the petition for writ of habeas corpus “on the ground that the petitioner has failed to exhaust remedies available to him in the courts of the state of Ohio.”

[*425] This court has recently affirmed a similar decision in a case which dealt with Ohio postconviction remedies. Harris v. Maxwell, 337 F.2d 710, decided September 18, 1964 (C.A. 6, 1964).

Affirmed.