Charles Henry Hall v. Sherman H. Crouse, 339 F.2d 316 (10th Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Charles Henry Hall v. Sherman H. Crouse, 339 F.2d 316 (10th Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles Henry HALL, Appellant,
v.
Sherman H. CROUSE, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas, Appellee
7892.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Dec 14, 1964.
Published opinion
339 F.2d 316
1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3592
John R. McCandless, Norman, Okl., for appellant., Richard H. Seaton, Asst. Atty. Gen.. of Kansas (William M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen. of Kansas, on the brief), for ap-pellee.
Lewis, Breitenstein, Hill.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The appellant, a state prisoner, was denied relief after a full evidentiary hearing upon his petition for a writ of[*317] habeas corpus lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. He contends upon appeal, as he did below, that his state court conviction was not warranted by the evidence and is so faulty in such regard as to deny him due process of law.

The record of the state court proceedings is not devoid of evidentiary support so as to warrant relief by habeas corpus. See Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199, 80 S.Ct. 624, 4 L. Ed.2d 654. A summary of the evidence is set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Kansas, State v. Hall, 182 Kan. 331, 320 P.2d 860, and was held sufficient by that court to sustain the conviction.

Affirmed.