Morris Steinberg v. J. L. Dorfman & Sol Schoeman, 356 F.2d 471 (9th Cir. 1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Morris Steinberg v. J. L. Dorfman & Sol Schoeman, 356 F.2d 471 (9th Cir. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morris STEINBERG, Appellant,
v.
J. L. DORFMAN and Sol Schoeman, Appellees
19985.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 3, 1966.
Published opinion
356 F.2d 471
1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7287
Rodney Moss, Brown & Brown, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant., Aaron Elmore, Wiseman & Elmore, Beverly Hills, Cal., Lewis, Signer, Burns & Goldstone, Los Angeles, Cal., for ap-pellees.
Chambers, Barnes, Ely.
Published
PER CURIAM:

The order of the district court affirming the referee’s order denying Stein-berg a discharge in bankruptcy is affirmed.

The referee heard the testimony of the bankrupt concerning the inadequacy of his books and his explanation as to the disappearance of money which had been in the bankrupt’s hands. Obviously the referee disbelieved much, or a portion, of the attempted explanation.

We are not persuaded from our review of the record that the referee was mistaken. Thus, we cannot say his determination was clearly erroneous.