Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Florence Lustig Crossman, 356 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Florence Lustig Crossman, 356 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.
v.
Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig
22402_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 10, 1966.
Published opinion
356 F.2d 472
Published

356 F.2d 472

FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP., Appellant,
v.
Florence Lustig CROSSMAN, a/k/a Florence Lustig trading and doing business as Florence Lustig, Appellee.

No. 22402.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

February 10, 1966.

Richard P. Kenney, Miami, Fla., Williams, Salomon & Kenney, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

Robert C. Ward, Miami, Fla., for appellee, Ward & Ward, Miami, Fla., of counsel.

Before JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

[*~472–473]1

It is the opinion of this Court that the judgment of the district court dismissing the proceedings before it was properly entered. That judgment is

2

Affirmed.