United States v. James Williams, 359 F.2d 433 (4th Cir. 1966). · Go Syfert
United States v. James Williams, 359 F.2d 433 (4th Cir. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
James WILLIAMS, Appellant
10332.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 8, 1966.
Published opinion
359 F.2d 433
1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6560
Richard S. Tilley, Roanoke, Va. (Court-assigned counsel) [Tilley & Ped-igo, Roanoke, Va., on the brief] for appellant., William C. Breckinridge, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee.
Haynsworth, Boreman, Barks-Dale.
Published
PER CURIAM:

Appellant, defendant below, was convicted by a jury on a charge of theft from an interstate shipment in violation of Title 18 U.S.C., Section 659. At the time of the theft the shipment was being transported from New Jersey to Arkansas by the defendant in his employer's truck. The only point of error urged on this appeal is the admission in evidence, over objection, of certain waybills or shipping orders pertaining to the interstate shipment prepared by the shippers and signed by the defendant.

Upon consideration of the record, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, we perceive no reversible error. Therefore, the judgment below will be affirmed.

Affirmed.