United States v. Jose Lugo, 584 F. App'x 789 (9th Cir. 2014). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Jose Lugo, 584 F. App'x 789 (9th Cir. 2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jose LUGO, AKA Jose Ignacio-Zamaron Lugo, Defendant-Appellant
14-10008.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 15, 2014.
Unpublished opinion
584 F. App'x 789
Anne Elizabeth Mosher, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Stephanie Kathryn Bond, Esquire, Law Offices of Stephanie K. Bond, PC, Tucson, AZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Bea, Ikuta, Hurwitz.
Unpublished  |  Criminal

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant Jose Lugo appeals the district court’s imposition of a 16-level sentencing .enhancement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Lugo’s prior conviction for violating CaLPenal Code § 261.5(d), which prohibits unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor under 16, is categorically a crime of violence within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). See United States v. Gomez-Mendez, 486 F.3d 599, 603 (9th Cir.2007) (concluding that the generic crime of statutory rape encompasses “the full range of conduct proscribed by Cal.Penal Code § 261.5(d)”). Our decisions defining the term “sexual abuse of a minor” do not alter the elements of generic statutory rape. See United States v. Zamorano-Ponce, 699 F.3d 1117, 1120 (9th Cir.2012).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.