No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JOSEPH G. MORETTI, INC., Appellant,
v.
CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO., Caterpillar Americas Co. and Cardoze & Lindo, Appellees
v.
CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO., Caterpillar Americas Co. and Cardoze & Lindo, Appellees
22568_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 15, 1966.
Published opinion
368 F.2d 231
Henry L. Newell, Roy Phillips, Balboa Canal Zone, Lucien G. Woodard, Miami, Fla., for appellant., M. T. Woodward, Jr., New Orleans, La., Carlos Icaza A., Republic of Panama, Seth M. Dabney, New York City, Kenneth Vander Leest, Peoria, 111., Elizabeth Ridnour Haak, Herschel L. Haag III, New Orleans, La., Milling, Saal, Saunders, Benson & Woodward, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for appellees.
Jones, Wisdom, Goldberg.
Published
PER CURIAM:
The facts from which this controversy arose and the principles of law which control the disposition thereof are set forth in the opinion of the district judge. Moretti v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., D.C., 237 F.Supp. 481. Approving that which was there said, the judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.