Armco Steel Corp. v. Burleigh Cnty., North Dakota, 376 F.2d 215 (8th Cir. 1967). · Go Syfert
Armco Steel Corp. v. Burleigh Cnty., North Dakota, 376 F.2d 215 (8th Cir. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
BURLEIGH COUNTY, NORTH DAKOTA Et Al., Appellees
18187_1.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Apr 11, 1967.
Published opinion
376 F.2d 215
1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6789
William R. Pearce, of Pearce, Enge-bretson, Murray & Anderson, Bismarck, N. D., for appellant and filed printed brief., Albert A. Wolf, Bismarck, N. D., for appellees Burleigh County, and others and filed brief with David L. Milhollan, Bismarck, N. D.
Johnsen, Blackmun, Young.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This, like Armco Steel Corp. v. Adams County, 8 Cir., 376 F.2d 212, decided concurrently herewith, is an appeal by Armco from the separate treble-damage judgments rendered in favor of a number of North Dakota Counties for injury from violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1. As in the Adams County case, the violation relied on was the conspiratorial fixing of prices upon corrugated culverts during the period of 1957-1960.

The amounts of the treble damages awarded are as follows: Burleigh County $28,360.35; McClean County $14,300.-73; Stark County $21,755.25; Kidder County $7,082.94; Sheridan County $12,940.38; Golden Valley County $5,-154.39; Hettinger County $1,754.22; Grant County $1,709.43; Oliver County $11,527.02; Wells County $31,630.86.

The questions sought to be raised are controlled by our decisions in Armco Steel Corp. v. State of North Dakota, 8 Cir., 376 F.2d 206, and the Adams County case, supra, and these require af-firmance of the present judgments.

[*216] The sum of $300.00 will be allowed appellees in partial printing cost of the supplemental record filed by them. The sum of $1,000.00 will be allowed them as a joint attorney’s fee on the appeal, based upon the considerations which have been set out in our opinion in the Adams County, case, supra. Both allowances will be taxed as costs against appellant.

Affirmed.