Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Crump v. City of New York
Plaintiff’s communications with Pulaski and IAB are equally vague (see Kwong, 204 AD3d at 445 ; Gonzalez v EVG, Inc., 123 AD3d 486, 487 [1st Dept 2014]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Roberson v. New York City Health & Hosp. Corp.
NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/03/2024 In Gonzalez, the plaintiff failed to state a claim for retaliation, as his general complaints of mistreatment and harassment did not convey that he had complained of unlawful discrimination (see Gonzalez v. EVG, Inc., 123 AD3d 486, 487 [1st Dept 2014]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Silva v. Giorgio Armani Corp.
That plaintiff received a positive review before the decision to terminate him was made is insufficient to infer a discriminatory motive (see Kwong, 204 AD3d at 444 [receipt of positive performance evaluations not enough to raise a triable issue]; Gonzalez v EVG, Inc., 123 AD3d 486, 487 [1st Dept 2014] [same]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Rivera v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
The foregoing evidence supports the jury’s finding that defendant engaged in gender discrimination in violation of the New York City Human Rights Law (City HRL) (see Gonzalez v EVG, Inc., 123 AD3d 486, 487 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Walsh v Covenant House, 244 AD2d 214, 215 [1st Dept 1997]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pichardo v. Carmine's Broadway Feast Inc.
The evidence also raised triable issues as to whether plaintiff was treated differently from other employees of his ethnic background because of his skin color ( see Williams, 61 AD3d at 78 ; see generally Gonzalez v EVG, Inc. , 123 AD3d 486 , 487-488 [1st Dept 2014]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pichardo v. Carmine's Broadway Feast Inc.
The evidence also raised triable issues as to whether plaintiff was treated differently from other employees of his ethnic background because of his skin color ( see Williams, 61 AD3d at 78 ; see generally Gonzalez v EVG, Inc. , 123 AD3d 486 , 487-488 [1st Dept 2014]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Sterling Glass, Appellant
v.
Sterling Glass, Appellant
13727 5641/11.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 9, 2014.
Mazzarelli, Renwick, Andrias, Saxe, Kapnick.
Published
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on or about May 2, 2012, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Saxe and Kapnick, JJ.