green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- Wei Zhang v. Am. Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corp. McMi Food Co., a Texas Corp. Harry Lees, a Nat. Person, 339 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2003).published
- Davignon v. Hodgson, 524 F.3d 91 (1st Cir. 2008).published
- Webb v. GAF Corp., 936 F. Supp. 1109 (N.D.N.Y. 1996).published
- Lusby v. T.G. & Y. Stores, Inc., 749 F.2d 1423 (10th Cir. 1984).published
- Lusby v. Stores, Inc., 749 F.2d 1423 (10th Cir. 1984).published
- Ayala v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 55 F.R.D. 263 (S.D.N.Y. 1972).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Elof Malm
v.
United States Lines Company
v.
United States Lines Company
31199.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 5, 1967.
Published opinion
Published
Elof MALM, Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Appellant.
No. 489, Docket 31199.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued May 31, 1967.
Decided June 5, 1967.
Daniel J. Dougherty, New York City (Charles N. Fiddler, Kirlin Campbell & Keating, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas E. P. McElligott, Fields, Rosen, McElligott & Auslander, New York City, for appellee.
Before WATERMAN, SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
We affirm on the basis of Judge Weinfeld's opinion in the District Court, reported at 269 F.Supp. 731 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).[1]
1
Since neither party on appeal raised the issue of maintenance and cure, we have not considered that portion of Judge Weinfeld's opinion